Stakeholders vs End Users
Who decides and funds, versus who actually uses the thing — and why you need both.
What you'll learn
- Tell stakeholders apart from end users
- Use a power/interest grid to prioritise people
- Avoid building things that get approved but unused
A stakeholder has interest in or influence over a project — they fund it, approve it, or can block it. A business end user actually uses what gets built, day to day. Sometimes the same person; usually not. Confusing the two is one of the most common — and most expensive — mistakes in corporate work, because they want different things and you have to satisfy both.
A quick gut check: ask “does this person decide about the thing, or do their job with the thing?” Deciders, funders, and blockers are stakeholders. The people whose hands are on it every shift are end users. Keep that question handy; you’ll use it constantly.
Stakeholders can approve a project to death; end users can ignore it to death. You need both.
The diagram above captures the whole tension in one line. Stakeholders approve and fund the work; end users use and rely on it. Each group can sink a project in its own way.
When you ignore stakeholders, your project never gets the money, the sign-off, or the political cover it needs. Legal blocks it at the last minute, finance pulls the budget, or a department head you never consulted quietly kills it. The work might be brilliant, but it never ships.
When you ignore end users, you get the opposite failure: the thing ships, everyone in the steering committee claps — and then nobody actually uses it. Frontline staff find it slower than the spreadsheet they had before, so they quietly keep using the spreadsheet. The project is “done” on paper and dead in practice. This is the classic approved-but-unused trap, and it’s heartbreakingly common with internal tools chosen by people who will never touch them.
A useful rule: involve end users early, and keep stakeholders informed throughout. Show users a rough version before it’s finished and you’ll catch the “this doesn’t fit how I actually work” problems while they’re still cheap to fix.
Notice the overlap, too. A team lead who both approves a new system and has to use it daily is wearing both hats — treat them as both. The categories describe roles, not people, so one person can occupy more than one.
Prioritising people: the power/interest grid
You can’t give everyone equal attention. Map each stakeholder by how much power they have and how much interest they have — then treat each quadrant differently.
High power + high interest = manage closely. Low/low = just monitor. Match effort to the quadrant.
- High power, high interest — manage closely. These are your key people: the sponsor, the decision-maker, the loud department head. Bring them into the room, update them often, and never let them be surprised.
- High power, low interest — keep satisfied. They can block you but don’t care about the details. Give them enough to stay comfortable; don’t drown them in updates they’ll resent.
- Low power, high interest — keep informed. Often your end users and enthusiasts. They can’t sign the cheque, but they have ground-truth and goodwill — keep them in the loop and they’ll champion you.
- Low power, low interest — monitor. A light touch is enough. Don’t spend energy here that the top-right quadrant needs.
The point isn’t to rank people by worth; it’s to match effort to influence and interest so the right people get the right amount of your limited attention.
Spot it: stakeholder or user
Read each person and decide what role they’re playing on a project, then tap a card to flip it and check your answer.
Sort the grid
Drag each person into their quadrant on the power/interest grid — or tap an item, then tap a bucket. Hit Check placement when you’re done.
Here's where each one goes:
- The project sponsor funding the work and checking in weekly → Manage closely — they have both power and interest, so they need regular updates and collaboration.
- Frontline staff who will use it daily but have no say in approval → Keep informed — they have high interest but no formal power, so keep them engaged without burdening them.
- A director who can block it but hasn't shown interest yet → Keep satisfied — they wield power but aren't actively engaged, so give them enough to feel comfortable.
- A colleague in another team who glanced at it once → Monitor — low power and low interest means a light touch is enough.
- The VP sponsor reviewing every decision → Manage closely — high power and actively involved, so treat as a key stakeholder.
- A power user enthusiast pushing adoption on the team → Keep informed — high interest (champion) but no approval authority, so enable and listen to them.
Tip: drag with a mouse, or tap an item then tap a bucket on touch screens. Get one wrong and the answer key appears.
How to use it
At the start of any project, spend ten minutes listing two columns: who can approve or block this? (stakeholders) and who will actually use it? (end users). Then drop the stakeholders onto the power/interest grid and decide your communication plan for each quadrant. Re-check the list when the project changes — people move quadrants as priorities shift, and a quiet monitor today can become a manage-closely sponsor tomorrow.
Why it matters
Projects rarely fail on the technical work; they fail because someone important wasn’t consulted or because the people meant to use the result never bought in. Separating stakeholders from end users — and giving each what they actually need — is how you build things that get both approved and used. That’s the difference between work that ships and work that matters.
Quick check
1. A VP approves buying a tool she'll never log into. She is a…
2. Someone with high power and high interest should be…
3. A project that's approved by everyone but unused usually ignored its…